Easy reply History 2

In regards to the Monroe doctrine, I do believe that the U.S . was to the right for selecting to stick with the ideas of the Monroe doctrine. Many of the original settlers came to the Us to steer clear of European control and tradition. The US was built on the back of individuals that wanted to be able to express them selfs freely, with out over site from others thousands of miles away. The initial intent of the Monroe doctrine was for the US to stay out of warring action being taken with in Europe. But along with that any interference with colonies in the US, by foreign entities would be taken as an act of war and appropriate response would be given. many of the founding father wanted isolationism for the country. The opinion that I hold is that the US was well within its rights to accept and follow the Monroe doctrine.

Agree or Disagree to the post 2-3 sentences

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

the APUS/AMU Online Library Graduate Studies Center, sociology homework help

**Earlier work has been uploaded to aid in making sure bibliography matches. Thanks!!*******

Assignment Instructions

Using the aids in your classroom and in the APUS/AMU Online Library Graduate Studies Center, compose the first ten entries to begin an annotated bibliography on your proposed topic. The specific format of the annotated bibliographic entries to be used in shown in example form at:

http://libguides.brandonu.ca/content.php?pid=26571…

The discussion for each entry will consist of a single paragraph including the following:

First 1-2 sentences will establish the credentials of the author(s) or creating entity

Nest 3-4 sentences will discuss content

The final 1-2 sentences will explain how the source is valuable to your particular topic

NOTE: Remember to write in the third person formal.

Submit with a standard APA title page and a References list *(the references list will include the basic citations from the annotated bibliographic entries only).

Rubric: See:

http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=K7B6WX…

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Writing an essay summary only 2 pages length about the movie ( Imitation Of Life 1959)

I need you to write an essay summary of the movie above

And include in this essay:

– A running list of important characters and their narratives (names, how we identify them, what role they play in the film, what ultimately happens to them).

– A list of important moments/plot points in the film.

– A list of recurring symbols, themes, motifs, language, etc. that you notice.

– A list of at least five questions the film raises for you.

– A 1 paragraph reflection on the film.

– 2 pages minimum, 4 pages average or 6 pages maximum

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Analysis, 3 pages

Because much has changed since Swift’s proposal was published in 1729, this week’s journal allows you to compose a contemporary food related satire or parody. It is up to you whether the target of the satire or parody is political or social.

Be sure to adhere to the conventions of fiction in terms of integrating dialogue, ect. Use Microsoft Word to compose the document.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Bible Old Testament 15 questions.

APA format, 2 references with in text citations. 1200 words total so about 80 words per question.

1. What were Solomon’s strengths and weaknesses as a king?

2. What factors contributed to the negative reaction of the northern tribes to Rehoboam?

3. Why did the worship of Baal appeal to the Israelites so strongly?

4. Why did Ahab handle Elijah differently from the way Jezebel dealt with him?

5. How are the portrayals of Elijah and Elisha alike, and how do they differ?

6. What happened to bring an end to the hostilities between Israel and Judah?

7. Who was Athaliah? Why is she a significant figure in Israel’s story?

8. How did Judah manage to survive the Assyrian invasions that destroyed Israel and Syria in the later eighth century (745-721 B.C.E.)?

9. How did Hezekiah prepare for a possible invasion by the Assyrians during Sennacherib’s reign?

10. What possible physical evidence has been found to confirm Hezekiah’s reform?

11. What does Lamentations tell us about conditions in Jerusalem during the Babylonian siege?

12. What were the three major groups of Israelites that formed in the wake of the Babylonian destruction, and how were they related to each other?

13. How did Cyrus’ conquest of the Babylonians affect the Jews in exile?

14. Assess the relative significance of Ezra and Nehemiah to the Jerusalem community.

15. How did Ezra and Nehemiah address the issue of foreign wives? Why?

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

essay about the change in conversation overtime

This draft should be an 800-1,000 word literature review that argues how a scholarly conversation about your chosen topic ( How do hurricanes impact the US Gulf states economy? ) has changed—or not changed—over a period of time, using two sources published between 2000 and 2010 and two sources published between 2011 and 2017. You should integrate summarized, paraphrased, and quoted materials from your four sources to demonstrate your understanding and provide support for your thesis
. There is a structure of the outline (only the structure, with no content) and a picture that explains how you should write the body (subject matter or time period based, also the picture gives more explanation about what is subject matter and what is time-period-based). Also please find the annotated bibliography for the six sources attached below. Moreover, the sources will also be attached inside the annotated bibliography. If there is any problem accessing the sources, please do tell.
These are Three sources and three rest are attached below. In order to access these sources you need this username and password, name: halsowaidi, pass: Humaid1234. The time the sources published are from 2000-2017. However, you are going to choose two from 2000-2010, and two from 2011-2017, and make the comparison from that. 

Project Description/Assignment
(two sources published between 2000 and 2010 and two sources published between 2011 and 2016) that demonstrate change or lack of change in perspective over time.
You will create an 800-1,000 word literature review concerning global and cultural interrelationships and interdependence across place and time that includes the following:
1. An introduction that states your thesis (a claim) about how the scholarly conversation has changed over time
2. Evidence from the research you did in Project 1 ( the annotated bibliography which is attached) to support your thesis; quote, summarize, and paraphrase according to MLA guidelines (no need for a title page)
3. Four sources from your annotated bibliography, two sources published between 2000 and 2010, and two sources published between 2011 and 2016
4. Connections between sources (comparisons and contrasts) to support your argument
Purpose
In Project 2, you will research and write a literature review that argues how a scholarly conversation about your chosen topic has changed–or not changed–over a period of time. Your audience for this project is an academic audience who is unfamiliar with the topic and changes in perspectives regarding the topic. Project 1 lays the foundation of research and understanding of scholarship concerning global and cultural interrelationships and interdependence across place and time. You will further develop your research question to reflect the evolution of the research process as it moves from an annotated bibliography to an evidence-based academic essay.
-
PS you are going to talk about the change in conversation not the topic itself.


: http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/s


http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/stable/pd


https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/arti

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Argumentative essay

MY TOPIC IS ON ANIMAL TESTING

Appendix:the required format for the term paper.

Submit your paper in printed format in person at the beginning of class time on the day it is due.

Each word(s) and/or item in bold in this appendix (i.e., Claim, Explanation, Reasons For/Against, Rebuttals, numbers (1) – (4) or (I) – (IV)) should appear on your paper.

The most important part about the paper is that it should contain your original thoughts and arguments. In other words, this is an argumentative opinion paper, not a research paper. It is easily ascertained when you have taken concepts, reasons, and discussion from some other source.The only things that you are allowed to research are facts, which must be documented. The length should be 5 – 7 pages.

Claim:

A single well-worded declarative statement.

Common problems: Vague claims; claims posed in the form of a question;too broad or too narrow claims; more than one issue in the claim.

Explanation of the claim:You should explain very carefully and in common-sense vocabulary what you mean by the claim itself and by the terms involved in the claim.Common problems: assuming that the terms your use are self-explanatory.The reader of your paper will assume no prior knowledge of your subject on his part,If your do not explain your terms,concepts, relationships you will start losing points.Arguing in the explanation part of the paper, rather than explaining what you mean by your claim.

Reasons For the Claim: Each reason for the claim should be numbered with Arabic numerals (1), (2), (3), (4), (5).You should provide at least four reasons for your claim, if you are aiming for an A. Each reason must be unpacked in a whole paragraph.

Common problems: sketchy arguments; insufficiently developed arguments; argument borrowed from other sources (even if documented); weak or not well-thought out arguments.

Reasons Against the Claim: Here you step into the shoes of your hypothetical opponent and think of reasons why your claim doesn’t hold.Each reason against the claim should be numbered with Roman numerals (I), (II), (III), (IV).You should provide at least four reasons against your claim. Each reason must be unpacked in a whole paragraph.Reasons Against the Claim should not be parallel to Reasons For the Claim.

Common problems: same as above; attempting to rebut the arguments presented in Reasons For the Claim – this belongs to the Rebuttal section.

Decision: At this point in the paper you must decide which set of reasons (i.e., Reasons For or Reasons Against the Claim) is a stronger set.You must explain why you think a particular set of reasons is stronger.This part must be a full paragraph rather than a couple of sentences.

Rebuttals: At this point in the paper you must provide a counterargument against each reason in the set of reasons that you found to be weaker (in the Decision part of the paper).For example, if you found Reasons For the Claim to be a weaker set of reasons, you must counter-argue against (1), (2), (3), (4).Conversely, if you found Reasons Against to be a weaker set, you must counter-argue against (I), (II), (III), (IV).Each counterargument must be unpacked in a whole paragraph.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Easy Journal question

Write a jourrnal entry. No Plagiarism will be tolerated. Will result in a withdrawal. Need good quality work.

Do you believe in “American Exceptionalism”? Do you believe that America is intrinsically different from other countries? If so, is that “difference” something that is positive or negative? (Consider the work of De Tocqueville when journaling this topic.) His writings democracy in america and other works. 200-350 words. More if necessary.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

From Russia with Love

Fleming’s Bond novels construct an artistic version of the ideologically divided world of the Cold War. In Fleming’s story world of clandestine conflict, if you have the right skills, adventure can happen anywhere—but Istanbul, and the Turkish people, are the perfect setting for the work of a British warrior assassin like Bond. Locate and discuss language in Chapters 13 and 14 that paints a picture of Turkey and the Turks as primitive and Bond as equal to this condition, a kind of Cold War frontiersman or Tarzan. 300 words

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"