nursing apa style is a must! Read the “The three-minute appraisal of a randomized trial” article. Identify one Randomized controlled trial in your topic of interest and answer the questions of the checklist for evaluating a randomized controlled trial (see the practical example in this article) Your post should be a minimum of 250-300 words. Back up your arguments with reliable evidence.
nursing Select aA description of how at least one intervention might be implemented in the aggregate to address an identified issue An evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention The Power Point presentation should be concise and should include the highlights of the Capstone project and the key things learned over the course of this project, from developing, planning interventions, and evaluating the care plan. Your presentation should not exceed 15 slides. ****The chosen aggregate is African Americans in Gadsden, Alabama (Etowah County)*** I will attach the previous assignments and the grading rubric for thisn online article (professional health care source) or professional website which focuses on infectious diseases of global concern. Summarize the article, and explain its significance to the course content and global health. Include the link or citation. No abstract is needed. Please include a reference page and attach your work as WORD document. Your paper should be 2-3 pages long excluding the title page and reference page. Your paper must: Be a minimum of one typed page for the summary and one typed page for the significance. Use two headings: Summary of article and Significance to course content and global health. Refer to course syllabus and module objectives. Include a minimum of 3 course/modular objectives. You can cite the syllabus or the modules/lessons. The resource must be one that is not included in the course modules or library references. Reference must be less than 5 years old. Infectious Disease must be of global concern. Be sure the link is active on the reference page. No duplicate articles will be accepted. Review the submitted work before you post. Be sure to include your name on the paper or a Title page.
Capstone Final Project Phase 7 & 8: Powerpoint presentation & Evaluation Essay Evaluation of Plan Effectiveness Criteria In the evaluation component of the Capstone project, you are expected to discuss how you would evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. Some questions you should seek answers to are: Would I be able to implement the interventions? If not, what barriers exist? What visible signs of success (for example, reduced health issues) would I look for? What is your projected effectiveness? The evaluation component of the final paper should describe your evaluation of the implementation. Include responses to points 1 and 2 above. The evaluation component of the final Microsoft Word submission document should be a minimum of 2 pages.The complete summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project. Over the past nine weeks, you selected an aggregate and conducted a risk assessment of its health, developed a care plan to address those health risks, and considered the effectiveness of the interventions on the health of the aggregate. It’s time now for you to present your final submission of this Capstone project. Your final submission should include: the documentation of the work accomplished through your Capstone project, a Microsoft Word Document that contains the evaluation and summary, and a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation highlighting the main aspects of the project including the key things learned during the 10 weeks of working with this project. The summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project. The complete documentation of the work accomplished over the course of the project should contain a minimum of 6–7 pages in a Microsoft Word document and should include the following information: A detailed description of the aggregate A description of the aggregate’s strengths and weaknesses A risk assessment of the aggregate Diagnoses based on the risk assessment A detailed care plan for the aggregateA description of how at least one intervention might be implemented in the aggregate to address an identified issue An evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention The Power Point presentation should be concise and should include the highlights of the Capstone project and the key things learned over the course of this project, from developing, planning interventions, and evaluating the care plan. Your presentation should not exceed 15 slides. ****The chosen aggregate is African Americans in Gadsden, Alabama (Etowah County)*** I will attach the previous assignments and the grading rubric for this
Capstone Project Milestone 1: Practice Issue and Evidence Summary Guidelines Purpose Clear identification of the practice issue is the first step in evidence-based nursing. Next, the evidence is reviewed to determine the best intervention to change practice outcomes. Completion of the milestone will include identification of the practice issue using the ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation and a review of the evidence that will support an intervention that will change outcomes. The evidence summary will be conducted through the ‘breaking down’ of a systematic review on your topic for your change project. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO4: Develops and outlines a scientific, systematic decision-making process to integrate critical thinking with clinical judgment to assure safe and effective outcomes. (PO4) CO8: Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO8)Due Dates Milestone 1 consists of the completion of ONE form with two worksheets called the Practice Issue and Evidence Summary Worksheets. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Complete both worksheets Practice Issue Worksheet Directions A tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed at https://atge.webex.com/atge/ldr.php?RCID=4905b26a67572323c11b839e3251c96a (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Choose the ONE systematic review topic that is of most interest to you, or most relevant to your practice situation, from the List of Approved Systematic Reviews (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Follow the grading criteria below to formulate your practice issue, which must be based on the topic of the systematic review you have selected. Use the worksheet to document the practice issue presented and approved by your instructor in the Week 2 Discussions. Your practice issue will be the same for all three Milestone assignments in this course. Please type your answers directly into the wEvidence Summary Worksheet Directions Develop an evidence summary by following the grading criteria below. Document this on the evidence summary portion of the worksheet. You will use this worksheet to incorporate your evidence summary into your Week 4 Milestone 2 assignment. Please type your answers directly into the worksheet. **Academic Integrity Reminder** Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately References Krogstad, J. M. (2015). Reflecting a racial shift, 78 counties turned majority-minority since 2000. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/08/reflecting-a-racial-shift-78-counties-turned-majority-minority-since-2000/ O’Daniel, M., & Rosenstein, A. H. (2008). Professional communication and team collaboration. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Sanson-Fisher, R. W. (2004). Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. Medical Journal of Australia, 180, 55-56. The Joint Commission. (2009). The Joint Commission guide to improving staff communication(2nd ed.). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission Resources. The Joint Commission. (2015). Quick safety: Overcoming the challenges of providing care to LEP patients. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/issues/article.aspx?Article=07L7HYJFF9ixfyUPFpDzwohKEfieQSJZAT2%2bhFsYXm0%3d Vardaman, J. M., Cornell, P., Gondo, M. B., Amis, J. M., Townsend-Gervis, M., & Thetford, C. (2012). Beyond communication: The role of standardized protocols in a changing health care environment. Health Care Management Review, 37(1), 8897. doi:10.1097/HMR.0b013e31821fa503 Rubric NR451_Milestone1 NR451_Milestone1 Criteria
Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization. (Appropriate individuals include unit managers, department directors, clinical supervisors, charge nurses, and clinical educators.) Obtain feedback from the leader you have selected and request verification using the Capstone Review Form. Submit the signed Capstone Review Form to [email protected] For information on how to complete the assignment, refer to “Writing Guidelines” and the “Exemplar of Evidence-Based Practice Capstone Paper.” Include a title page, abstract, problem statement, conclusion, reference section, and appendices (if tables, graphs, surveys, diagrams, etc. are created from tools required in Topic 4). Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubricPlease review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
In collaboration with your approved course mentor, you will identify a specific evidence-based practice proposal topic for the capstone project. Consider the clinical environment in which you are currently working or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a quality improvement suggestion, a leadership initiative, or an educational need appropriate to your area of interest as well as your practice immersion (practicum) setting. Examples of the integration of community health, leadership, and an EBP can be found on the “Educational and Community-Based Programs” page of the Healthy People 2020 website. Write a 500-750 word description of your proposed capstone project topic. Make sure to include the following: The problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need that will be the focus of the project The setting or context in which the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need can be observed. A description providing a high level of detail regarding the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need.Impact of the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need on the work environment, the quality of care provided by staff, and patient outcomes. Significance of the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need and its implications to nursing. A proposed solution to the identified project topic You are required to retrieve and assess a minimum of 8 peer-reviewed articles. Plan your time accordingly to complete this assignment. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Hide
Topic: Vulnerable Population: Mental Disorders Capstone Project Milestone 2 Design for Change Proposal Guidelines Purpose You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your Practice Issue and Evidence Summary worksheet from your Capstone Project Milestone 1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program. Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1) CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2) Due Date Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Submit this assignment to the Dropbox by the end of Week 4. Points Milestone 2 is worth 225 points. DirectionsThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1) CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2) Due Date Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Submit this assignment to the Dropbox by the end of Week 4. Points Milestone 2 is worth 225 points. DirectionsCitations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, âHow do I know this?â and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites. Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change. Grading Criteria: Design for Change Capstone Project Category Points % Description Introduction 25 11%Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified. Change Model Overview 50 22% Practice issue is identified and is nursing focused. An overview of the ACE Star model is given. The need for change is evident. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and their role are identified and discussed. Scope of the problem is identified. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change. Evidence 50 22% Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use? Translation 5022% Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve. How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline? Conclusion 25 11% Clear, solid summary summarizing the key points and steps of the change plan is included; ways to sustain the change plan are described. APA Format 25 11% Minimal errors. Total 225 points 100% Grading Rubric: Capstone Project Milestone 2 Assignment Criteria A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance B (88%) ExceedsVery good or high level of performance C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance Introduction 25 points Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, andevidence-based.Potential interventions clearly identified. 25 points â Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based solutions identified but not clear. 22 points â Introduction to the plan is provided; however, the plan is not nursing focused and evidence-based solutionsarenot convincing. 20 points â Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based. 10 points â Introduction is missing. 0 points â Change Model Overview 50 points Practice issue is nursing focused.Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 50 points â Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 44 points â Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed but without detail. Scope of problem is identified. 40 points â Practice issue is nursing focused. Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed. Scope of problem is identified. 19 points â Change Model Overview is missing 0 points â Evidence 50 points Evidence is thoroughly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change. 50 points â Evidence is briefly provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change. 44 points Evidence is vaguely provided thru basic information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change. 40 points â Evidence is provided thru basic nformation of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change. 19 points â Evidence is not provided thru basic information of the current problem; there is no indication of change; there no interventions listed from the Evidence Summary. 0 points â Translation 50 points Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translateevidence into practice is discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed. 50 points â Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. How to translate evidence into practice is discussed but is not clear. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed. 44 points â Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described.How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 40 points â Activities to achieve final steps of change are described but not in detail. How to translate evidence into practice is not discussed. Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action but timeline is not mentioned. 19 points â Activities for final change plan is missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing. 0 points â Conclusion 25 points Detailed summary of main points. Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described. 25 points â Summary of main pointsis brief. Ways to sustainplan are briefly described. 22 points â Summary of main points is vague. Ways to sustainplan are vaguely described. 20 points â Summary of main points is vague. Ways to sustain change are not described. 10 points â Summary ismissing. There is no plan tosustain change. 0 points â APA formatting, scholarly writing 25 points APA format sixth edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct.Paper formatted in APA format. No errors to one error. 25 points â Two to three errors. 22 points â Four to five errors. 20 points â Six to seven errors. 10 points â More than seven errors. 0 points â Total Points
In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a coursework portfolio inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice. Students will develop a 1,250-1,500-word paper which includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the Change Proposal: Background Problem statementPurpose of the Change Proposal PICO(T) Literature search strategy employed
|
Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes. CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2) CO3: Communicates effectively with patient populations and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #3) CO7: Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO #7) Due DateMilestone 3 consists of the PowerPoint presentation Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project. Submit this Milestone to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end ofWeek 6. Points Milestone3 is worth 200 points. Directions Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project. The format for this proposal will be a PowerPoint presentation. Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found under the Special Courses list in eCollege. The length of the PowerPoint presentation should be 15-20 slides; excluding the title and reference slides. Below are the topics for the slides: Bullet (or main points) points on your slides, please Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. Citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, âHow do I know this?â and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means choose peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.Title slide Description of the Ace Star change model that you have used for this project. Practice Issue Scope of the problemâuse basic statisticsfrom what you know of the problem in your work area. Your team/stakeholders Evidence to support your need for changeâfrom your Evidence Summary Action Plan Timeline for the plan The nurseâs role and responsibility in the pilot program Procedure (what steps are to be taken to complete this change process, from start to finish?) Forms that will be used (if applicable) Resources available to the staffâincluding yourself Summary ReferencesGuidelines Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010. Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be between 15-20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide). Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: âEducating the Staff: Implementing the Change Projectâ by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6. Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions. Tutorial: If needed, Microsoft Office has many templates and tutorials to help you get started. Best Practices in Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.Be creative. Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest. Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Use speaker notes (found under the section View and âNotesâ in the PowerPoint template you choose. These are for your personal use to use as a reference if you are giving your presentation to an audience and they help faculty identify what you will speak to your audience about. Review directions thoroughly. Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the Reference slide. Proofread prior to final submission. Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Abide by the Chamberlain academic integrity policy. Grading Criteria: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Category Points % Description The Problem 30 15% Summary of change model discussed. PracticeIssue is stated. Scope of the problem includes basic statistics as it relates to your work area and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed as is logical. The Evidence35 17% Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes of the multiple views given in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. The Plan 35 17% Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. The Nurseâs Role 25 13% The nurseâs role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise. Resources 20 10% Form (if applicable) for tracking the outcomes during pilot plan is included. Resources the nurses will need to help implement the plan are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included. Summary 10 5% Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals in terms of success. Overall Presentation 20 10% Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. Speaker notes are present. Mechanics 25 13% Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check. Total 200 points00% Grading Rubric: Educating the staff Milestone 3 Assignment Criteria A (100%) Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance B (88%) Exceeds Very good or high level of performance C (80%) Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance NI (38%) Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance F (0%) Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance The Problem 30 points Summary of change model andPractice issue addressed Basic statistical information as it relates to work area, scope of problem to healthcare as a whole, discussed. Team, stakeholders and role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical. 30 points â Summary of change model andPractice issue addressed Basic statistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussed. Team, stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical. 26 points â Summary of change model discussed andPractice issue addressed Basic statistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussedminimally. Team, stakeholders and their role/reason chosen discussed and is logical. 24 points â Summary of change model is not discussed however,Practice issue is addressed Basicstatistical information as it relates to work area is missing and scope of problem to healthcare discussed Team and stakeholders stated but role/reason chosen is not discussed. 11 points â None of the elements werepresent. 0 points â The Evidence35 points Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes the author/s pull from the multiple articles in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 35 points â Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is in paragraph as one overriding theme pulled from the Systematic Review. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 31 points â Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of individual authors within the article. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 28 points Discussion of the evidence is done in terms individual authors. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 13 points â There is no discussionof the evidence. 0 points â The Plan 35 points Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. 35 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements included. ORTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 31 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements includedANDTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 28 points â Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete. The timeline is not appropriate or logical.Discussion of the evidence is done in terms individual authors. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 13 points â There is no discussionof the evidence. 0 points â The Plan 35 points Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. 35 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements included. ORTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 31 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements includedANDTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 28 points â Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete. The timeline is not appropriate or logical.Discussion of the evidence is done in terms individual authors. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 13 points â There is no discussionof the evidence. 0 points â The Plan 35 points Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. 35 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements included. ORTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 31 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements includedANDTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 28 points â Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete. The timeline is not appropriate or logical.Discussion of the evidence is done in terms individual authors. Pertinent information is not summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. 13 points â There is no discussionof the evidence. 0 points â The Plan 35 points Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. 35 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements included. ORTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 31 points â Plan of action described but not all important elements includedANDTimeline is present but doesnât contain all elements. 28 points â Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete. The timeline is not appropriate or logical.
