Demographic factors can influence the behavior of consumers in their decision to purchase

/in /by

see attachment>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Case study 7.1: Site Security and Secure Escorts, homework help

/in /by

Directions

Using information from the attached documents and from outside reading, please respond to each question below as regards to the corresponding case study in approximately 2-3 paragraphs per question. All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference list at the end of the paper. A cover sheet should minimally indicate the Case Study number and the date.

How to Write a Case Study

You have to think like a practicing manager if you want to analyze a case successfully. As part of your analysis, it is necessary, but not sufficient to answer the following questions in enough depth to show that you have performed more than a superficial reading of the case’s content, and subsequently applied relevant theory.

·  What is the issue being presented or analyzed in the case? Focus on the main issue in the case if more than one topic is presented. Use your judgment to decide on which issue is the one that is potentially most costly to an organization if left unresolved. There are more kinds of cost to be considered than economic costs. Do not neglect them in your analysis.

·  Where did the issue take place? Consider this because you need to take into account cultural and environmental considerations that may differ from those of the United States, in your analysis.

·  When did the issue take place? There may be historic and environmental considerations different from those of the United States, which should be taken into account in your analysis.

·  Who was affected by the issues? In other words, who are the stakeholders inside and outside of the organization that need to be considered when formulating an analysis, and possible response to the situation?

·  Why did the issue occur? This may involve conjecture on your part. It is all right to speculate; just identify your speculation as such. In an empirical case, causal factors may be identified as such.

·  How would you, as a manager, apply the insights gained from the case to improve an (your) organization’s operations?

Please answer in grammatically correct, well-formulated English sentences. Each paragraph should be organized around a single topic, and transitions should flow logically from one paragraph to the next.

Chapter 7, Case Study 7.1 – Site Security and Secure Escorts

Please read the case and:

A.  Submit answers to the four questions below.

B.  You may want to consider the above factors (“How to write a case study”) when you are preparing your case answers as an aid to organizing your information if you find it helpful. Please answer using the what, where, who, why and how. Thanks

1. What were the main steps in the diagnosis and who was involved at each stage?

2. Was there anything that influenced what the CEO paid attention to?

3. What were the main sources of information that informed the diagnosis?

4.  How was information obtained?

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

BU220 Herzing Week 1 Consumer Profile Presentation Help

/in /by

Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box or a

    file
     upload

Instructions

In the New Shoes simulation you will be marketing to three different target markets (

home
, domestic, and foreign). It becomes important to understand the consumer psychological and cultural profile for each market.

Create a PowerPoint

presentation
 to present to the marketing team of your New Shoes company to present a profile for your New Shoes consumer for the domestic and foreign markets using the criteria below.

  1. When Creating your Cultural Profile include the following elements:
    1. Cultural Types
    2. Subculture
    3. Social class
    4. Communication (verbal and non verbal) that can impact the Marketing process
    5. Social ( networks,

      family
      , roles and status)
    6. Personal (age and

      life cycle
       stage, occupation, economics, lifestyle, personality)
  2. When Creating Your Psychological Profile include the following elements:
    1. Consumer Perception of the product/service
    2. Why do consumers purchase this particular product/service? (motivation)
    3. What are your consumers’ needs, wants, desires, and fears?
    4. What are your consumers’ beliefs and values that may influence the purchase?

    Your PowerPoint presentation should be at least 8 slides in length (not including the Title page and Reference page). Ensure that your sources are properly cited using APA formatted guidelines and include professional graphics. An example of a successful reference slide with several web pages and an academic journal article is linked below.

    You may also use the required and supplementary resources from this unit.

    Assignment Parameters

    1. Accurate description and reference of all concepts and theories learned from course material.
    2. Practical examples of concepts that lead to continuing interest in the topic.
    3. Synthesis of concepts and theories from other course activities.
    4. Well-organized, clearly presented work ( free from excessive spelling and grammatical errors)
    5. Properly cited sources using APA 6th edition.
    6. Ensure use of the assignment rubric.

    Assignment Objectives

    • Examine how psychological as well as cultural factors influence consumer buying behavior.
    • Apply these factors when creating a marketing strategy for a product or service.

    Assignment Files

    Rubric

    BU220 Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile

    BU220 Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
    8.0 pts

    5

    Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 4.0 pts

    4

    Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 3.0 pts

    3

    Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 2.0 pts

    2

    Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 1.0 pts

    1

    There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
    8.0 pts

    5

    Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

    		 7.0 pts

    4

    Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

    		 6.0 pts

    3

    Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

    		 5.0 pts

    2

    Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

    		 4.0 pts

    1

    Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is no evidence of a defined statement.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to research
    8.0 pts

    5

    Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.

    		 7.0 pts

    4

    Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.

    		 6.0 pts

    3

    Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.

    		 5.0 pts

    2

    Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.

    		 4.0 pts

    1

    Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and related Outcomes
    12.0 pts

    5

    Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

    		 11.0 pts

    4

    Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.

    		 10.0 pts

    3

    Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.

    		 9.0 pts

    2

    Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).

    		 8.0 pts

    1

    Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.

    12.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
    2.0 pts

    5

    The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

    		 1.8 pts

    4

    The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do not impair the flow of communication.

    		 1.6 pts

    3

    The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

    		 1.4 pts

    2

    The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

    		 1.2 pts

    1

    The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

    2.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
    2.0 pts

    5

    The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.8 pts

    4

    The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.6 pts

    3

    The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.4 pts

    2

    The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.2 pts

    1

    Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

    2.0 pts

    Total Points: 40.0

    Next


     

    "Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

    Access to Education in United States Versus Ethiopia.

    /in /by

    what laws, practices, and attitude are found in both countries?

    what domains of development are affected by the access of education in United States and Ethiopia?

    In what specific ways do the attitude, practice, and/or laws found in that country affect the physical, cognitive, social, and/or personality development of the people living in Ethiopia? give example and address each domain individually

    what are the key difference and similarities in the access of Education between United States and Ethiopia?

    Must be APA style Include in-text citation

     

    "Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

    Cyber law and Current Emerging Technology Assignment

    /in /by

    Cyber law

    1.A. Please do an internet search and find out the results of the Erin Andrews invasion of privacy case that the Craig discusses in the assigned text. Write a commentary on your thoughts on the case.(Minimum 2 pages)

    Current & emerging technology

    2.Describe an example of a very poorly implemented database that you’ve encountered (or read about) that illustrates the potential for really messing things up. Include, in your description, an analysis of what might have caused the problems and potential solutions to them. Be sure to provide supporting evidence, with citations from the literature. (minimum 4 pages)

     

    "Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

    Du Shiniang Sinks Her Jewel Box in Anger Story Reflection Paper

    /in /by

    Please read the Chinese story and write 400 words reflection with three paragraph.

    First paragraph should be on the stories “Du Shiniang Sinks Her Jewel Box in Anger” and “Chung Shan Wolf” , briefly singling out their similarities and differences. Then, use the second to indicate how and why you find a particular story over the those stories to be most revealing and intricate in enabling you to understand the theme and to appreciate Chinese culture. Be sure to establish your criteria to make your evaluation valid and persuasive. Third paragraph is on what kind of life lessons you learn from such a story.

     

    "Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"